kNaru0online
When Mr. A filed a remedy request because his wife was unfairly dismissed,
<b>The labor attorney from the company's law firm submitted a response fabricating precedents using AI</b>
Mr. A thought something was off and searched for the precedents, but they didn't exist -> He asked the court to confirm, and only then <b>they admitted to using AI, but argued that using AI doesn't mean it was fabricated</b>
<b>Even more surprising, the court didn't know until Mr. A found out</b>
<b>+</b>
<b>For reference, police also got caught using GPT to write non-prosecution decisions with fabricated precedents</b>
Generate precedents with AI -> The court doesn't know
If this is the case, what's the point of the court? lol
"Folks are heated about a labor attorney using AI to fake precedents, and the internet is divided on who knew what and who's to blame. Some are calling out the author for misinformation, while others are just outraged."
#MixedNo comments yet.